JPM

JPMORGAN CHASE & CONYSE
View company geography

Valuation snapshot

Above base case

Price is between the base and bull cases.

Price as of Aug 17, 2026 · Valuation Aug 12, 2026

$362.84
price
$325.05
base IV/share

What drives JPM's base case?

base-case thesis

JPMorgan earned $57 billion in 2025 on $182.4 billion of revenue and has since accelerated, with revenue up 10% in the first quarter of 2026 and management raising its full-year lending-income forecast to about $105.5 billion. This case takes that guidance at face value for the first year or two, then lets growth settle back toward the mid-single digits as the interest-rate boost annualizes and fee income grows with the economy. Profitability stays near the 2025 level rather than the exceptional recent quarter, because management raised its expense plan by $2.5 billion and continues to describe a 17% return on tangible equity — below the 20% actually earned in 2025 — as the reasonable long-run figure. With a capital cushion well above requirements and a $31.6 billion buyback just completed, most of the profit keeps flowing back to shareholders rather than being retained.

What shapes the assumptions

  • Full-year 2026 lending income guided up to ~$105.5B from $95.4B in 2025

    Net interest income

    Raises revenue growth

  • Investment banking fees up 28% and record $11.6B Markets revenue in 1Q26

    Noninterest (fee) revenue

    Raises revenue growth

  • Adjusted expense plan raised $2.5B to ~$107.5B

    Noninterest expense

    Lowers operating margin

  • Management's 17% through-the-cycle return target versus 20% earned in 2025

    Return on tangible common equity

    Lowers operating margin

  • 14.1% CET1 cushion and completed $31.6B buyback

    Capital returned versus retained

    Lowers reinvestment

Each driver links a business metric to the forecast assumption it shapes — the basis for this case, not investment advice.

Why the gap?

The market is pricing this as if revenue grows 7.0% a year. Over the last 5 years it grew 8.6% a year, so the price assumes about what it has delivered.

What else could explain it?
Or, holding growth steady
the price is also consistent with a 42.4% operating margin, against the 38.0% assumed here.
How confident is this estimate?
Robustness 53.0/10 (Moderate) — some of any gap is our own uncertainty rather than disagreement.
What would change the answer?
Which assumption this valuation swings on, and by how much.

Many combinations of assumptions reproduce the same price. These are ways to read what the market might be expecting, not the market's actual view. How this is worked out

Research & assumptions

Inspect the valuation thesis, cases, risks, evidence, and model inputs.

Three independently researched cases generated automatically from published financials. Every assumption is justified and cited; the discount rate is computed from researched market inputs.

Base inputs from financials

source period →

Base revenue (TTM)

$187B

Diluted shares

2,720,200,000

Net cash

Bear

medium confidence

$207.01

IV / share

-42.9% vs $362.84

Enterprise

$563.1B

Equity

$563.1B

Discount rate

8.9%

Cost of equity

8.9%

Where the value comes from

Explicit cash flows
$57.96
Terminal value
$149.06
Net cash
$0.00
Intrinsic value / share
$207.01

72.0% of the value rests on the terminal value — high dependency. A small change to terminal growth moves the valuation a lot — see terminal growth below.

bear revenue growth (avg 2%) runs well above the trailing -19% trend

Revenue growth2.5% → 1.0% → 1.0% → 2.0% → 2.5%medium

How derived: Starting from the fact that FY2025 net revenue grew only 3% to $182.4B and that 2Q26's headline +27% included a $4.6B Visa gain plus $1.0B of equity gains, this case assumes the 2026 capital-markets and trading surge is cyclical and fades, so growth decays toward roughly 1% as Fed cuts compress deposit spreads before a slow late-decade recovery to ~2.5%.

Why this confidence: Company-disclosed FY2025 revenue and NII trend anchors the low end , Management explicitly quantified the one-time gains inflating 2Q26 , Five-year path depends on an unknown Fed rate cycle , Capital-markets revenue is inherently volatile and hard to forecast

Evidence for

  • FY2025 total net revenue rose only 3% to $182.4B, with NII excluding Markets flat versus the prior year — the underlying franchise was already decelerating before the 2026 trading surge.[JPMorganChase Full-Year 2025 Financial Results]· primary
  • 2Q26 results included a $4.6B net gain on Visa shares and $1.0B of gains on certain equity investments, so the reported 27% managed-revenue jump overstates the recurring run-rate.[JPMorganChase 2Q26 Earnings Press Release]· primary

Evidence against

  • 1Q26 net revenue rose 10% to $49.8B with investment banking fees up 28% and record Markets revenue of $11.6B, showing broad-based momentum beyond one-time items.[JPMorgan Chase 1Q 2026 Earnings]· secondary
  • Management raised full-year 2026 total NII guidance to about $105.5B from $103B, citing higher deposit balances across wholesale and consumer plus higher rates.[JPMorgan Chase Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript]· primary
Operating margin33.0%medium

How derived: FY2025 delivered roughly a 39% pre-tax margin ($57.0B net income grossed up at a ~19.5% tax rate on $182.4B of revenue), and this case cuts that to 33% because management already lifted 2026 adjusted expenses by $2.5B to ~$107.5B while credit provisions normalize off a 1.83% allowance coverage ratio.

Why this confidence: Explicit management expense guidance for the forecast's first year , Management's own 17% through-the-cycle ROTCE target supports margin normalization , Provision expense in a downturn is highly uncertain , Bank pre-tax margin is a derived, not directly disclosed, metric

Evidence for

Evidence against

Tax rate22.0%medium

How derived: JPM's trailing effective tax rate is about 19.5%, and this case moves it up to 22% because a lower-earnings mix reduces the relative benefit of tax-exempt municipal income and tax credits, and bank-specific levies remain a live policy risk.

Why this confidence: Long, stable multi-year history of reported effective rates , Tax policy toward large banks is a political variable outside the company's control , Single aggregator source for the most recent trailing rate

Evidence for

  • JPMorgan Chase's effective tax rate was reported at 19.46% as of March 2026, leaving room to drift up toward the 21% federal statutory rate plus state taxes if permanent-difference benefits shrink.[JPMorgan Chase Tax Rate]· secondary

Evidence against

  • JPM's 10-K income tax disclosures show the firm has sustained an effective rate below the statutory rate for a decade via tax-exempt income and credits, arguing against a sharp step-up.[JPMorgan Chase FY2025 Form 10-K]· primary
Reinvestment rate20.0%medium

How derived: JPM's CET1 ratio slipped to 14.1% in 2Q26 as risk-weighted assets and distributions outpaced earnings, and this case assumes 20% of after-tax earnings must be retained to rebuild capital against higher RWA and tighter regulatory buffers, leaving less free cash for shareholders.

Why this confidence: CET1 ratio and RWA trend are disclosed quarterly , Future regulatory capital requirements for G-SIBs remain unsettled , Reinvestment rate for a bank is a modeling construct, not a reported line

Evidence for

Evidence against

Terminal growth2.0%medium

How derived: With FY2025 revenue up just 3% and NII excluding Markets flat, this case sets long-run growth at 2% — roughly long-run inflation and below nominal GDP — on the view that a bank already holding ~10% of US deposits faces share-gain limits and secular fee-margin pressure.

Why this confidence: Anchored to disclosed core NII trend rather than a guess , Perpetual growth assumptions are unverifiable by nature , Set safely below the risk-free rate, limiting model blow-up risk

Evidence for

Evidence against

  • The 10-year Treasury yield stood at 4.68% on August 12, 2026, implying nominal growth expectations well above 2% and making a 2% perpetual rate conservative.[US 10-Year Treasury Yield]· secondary

Base

medium confidence

$325.05

IV / share

-10.4% vs $362.84

Enterprise

$884.2B

Equity

$884.2B

Discount rate

8.9%

Cost of equity

8.9%

Where the value comes from

Explicit cash flows
$77.95
Terminal value
$247.10
Net cash
$0.00
Intrinsic value / share
$325.05

76.0% of the value rests on the terminal value — high dependency. A small change to terminal growth moves the valuation a lot — see terminal growth below.

base revenue growth (avg 4%) runs well above the trailing -19% trend

Revenue growth5.5% → 4.5% → 4.0% → 4.0% → 3.8%high

How derived: Management guided full-year 2026 NII up to about $105.5B from $95.4B in 2025 and 1Q26 revenue grew 10%, so this case starts near 5.5% and decays toward ~4% as the NII step-up annualizes and fee growth settles to a mid-single-digit rate consistent with nominal GDP plus modest share gains.

Why this confidence: Explicit, recently raised management NII guidance for year one , Two consecutive quarters of disclosed double-digit revenue growth , Years three through five extend well beyond any guidance

Evidence for

Evidence against

Operating margin38.0%high

How derived: FY2025's $57.0B of net income on $182.4B of revenue implies about a 39% pre-tax margin, and this case holds 38% because management's raised revenue and expense guidance roughly offset, while its stated 17% through-the-cycle ROTCE target signals gradual normalization from the current 20-23% returns.

Why this confidence: Anchored to a full audited fiscal year of reported revenue and net income , Both revenue and expense guidance for the current year are public , Provision for credit losses over five years is cycle-dependent

Evidence for

Evidence against

Tax rate20.0%high

How derived: JPM's trailing effective tax rate of about 19.5% reflects a durable structure of tax-exempt municipal income and credits below the 21% federal statutory rate, and this case rounds it to 20% to allow for a slightly higher state and foreign mix as international businesses grow.

Why this confidence: Multi-year reported effective rates are tightly clustered , Assumption sits within one percentage point of the latest disclosed rate , Corporate tax policy is subject to legislative change

Evidence for

  • JPMorgan Chase's effective tax rate was 19.46% as of March 2026, closely bracketing the 20% assumed here.[JPMorgan Chase Tax Rate]· secondary
  • JPM's 10-K income tax footnote shows a decade of effective rates clustered in the high teens to low twenties.[JPMorgan Chase FY2025 Form 10-K]· primary

Evidence against

Reinvestment rate16.0%medium

How derived: JPM carries a 14.1% CET1 ratio and just completed a $31.6B buyback, so only a minority of earnings is needed to fund balance-sheet growth; this case retains 16% of after-tax profit — roughly the ~4% asset growth implied by mid-single-digit revenue growth divided by a high-teens return on equity.

Why this confidence: Capital ratios and buyback size are directly disclosed , Internally consistent with the growth and return assumptions in this case , Future G-SIB capital rules could change required retention

Evidence for

Evidence against

Terminal growth3.0%high

How derived: FY2025 revenue grew 3% — close to long-run US nominal GDP — and this case adopts 3% as the perpetual rate, comfortably below the 4.68% 10-year Treasury yield, on the view that a diversified universal bank ultimately grows with the nominal economy it finances.

Why this confidence: Matches a disclosed full-year revenue growth rate , Held below the observed risk-free rate , Perpetual assumptions can never be directly verified

Evidence for

Evidence against

Bull

low confidence

$480.33

IV / share

+32.4% vs $362.84

Enterprise

$1.3T

Equity

$1.3T

Discount rate

8.9%

Cost of equity

8.9%

Where the value comes from

Explicit cash flows
$99.04
Terminal value
$381.29
Net cash
$0.00
Intrinsic value / share
$480.33

79.4% of the value rests on the terminal value — high dependency. A small change to terminal growth moves the valuation a lot — see terminal growth below.

bull revenue growth (avg 7%) runs well above the trailing -19% trend

Revenue growth8.5% → 7.5% → 6.5% → 6.0% → 5.5%medium

How derived: 1Q26 revenue rose 10% and 2Q26 managed revenue rose 27% with every business line at a record, so this case assumes the capital-markets and payments franchise is structurally taking share and sustains high-single-digit growth that decays only gradually toward the mid-single digits.

Why this confidence: Two consecutive quarters of disclosed double-digit growth , Company disclosed that a large share of 2Q26 growth was non-recurring , Sustaining high-single-digit growth for five years exceeds any company guidance

Evidence for

Evidence against

Operating margin42.0%medium

How derived: Excluding one-time gains, 2Q26 still produced $16.9B of net income and a 23% ROTCE — above the 20% earned in 2025 — so this case assumes operating leverage holds as revenue outgrows the ~$107.5B expense plan, sustaining roughly a 42% pre-tax margin.

Why this confidence: Grounded in a company-published ex-notables profitability figure , Directly contradicted by management's own 17% through-the-cycle target , Assumes benign credit costs across a full five-year horizon

Evidence for

Evidence against

Tax rate18.5%medium

How derived: JPM's trailing effective rate of about 19.5% already sits below the 21% federal statutory rate thanks to tax-exempt income and credits, and this case trims it to 18.5% on the assumption that a larger municipal and tax-advantaged investment portfolio grows alongside a bigger balance sheet.

Why this confidence: Anchored within one point of the disclosed trailing rate , Assumes a further improvement with no specific management guidance behind it , Tax policy toward large banks is politically exposed

Evidence for

  • JPM's effective tax rate of 19.46% as of March 2026 is already below the 21% federal statutory rate, showing durable structural tax benefits.[JPMorgan Chase Tax Rate]· secondary

Evidence against

  • JPM's 10-K risk factors flag that changes in tax law and bank-specific levies could raise the firm's effective rate, making further reductions speculative.[JPMorgan Chase FY2025 Form 10-K]· primary
Reinvestment rate12.0%medium

How derived: With CET1 at 14.1% and a $31.6B buyback just completed against roughly $60B+ of annual earnings power, JPM is distributing the large majority of profit; this case retains only 12% because high returns on tangible equity let the firm fund growth internally while returning the rest.

Why this confidence: Buyback size and capital ratio are both publicly disclosed , In tension with this case's high growth path, which requires more risk-weighted assets , Depends on regulators continuing to permit large distributions

Evidence for

Evidence against

Terminal growth3.8%low

How derived: The 4.68% 10-year Treasury yield implies market nominal growth expectations well above 3%, and with every JPM business line at record revenue in 2Q26 this case sets perpetual growth at 3.8% — above nominal GDP but still safely under the risk-free rate — reflecting durable share gains in payments and capital markets.

Why this confidence: Exceeds the company's most recent full-year revenue growth of 3% , Perpetual growth for a firm already at ~10% of US deposits is hard to defend , Still constrained below the observed risk-free rate

Evidence for

Evidence against

Valuation robustness

reliability of the estimate, not a stock rating

53 / 100 · Moderate

Scenario dispersion5.8
Terminal-value dependency2.4
Historical stability0
Margin predictabilityn/a
Forecast visibility9.2
Evidence quality10

Formula v1.0.0. Higher means a more reliable estimate — not a recommendation.

Quality checks

Automated model-risk flags — warnings, not recommendations.

  • 76% of the intrinsic value rests on the terminal value — a small change to terminal growth moves the valuation a lot.terminal growth

Per-share economics

Business growth after changes in the diluted share count.

PeriodRevenue growthFCF/shareFCF/share growthSharesShare growth
Q2 202421.5%2.89B-1.8%
Q3 20247.0%2.87B-2.3%
Q1 20258.1%2.82B-3.0%
Q2 2025-10.5%2.79B-3.5%
Q3 20258.8%2.77B-3.4%
Q1 202610.0%2.72B-3.7%

Valuation history every run

Aug 12, 2026Bear$207.01Bull$480.33Base$325.05Price$362.61
$156.60$243.53$330.46$417.38$504.31Aug 6, 2026Aug 12, 2026

Why intrinsic value changed

Previous base IV/share+$290.77
Revenue forecast (forecast assumption)-$2.27
Operating-margin assumption (forecast assumption)-$14.43
Reinvestment assumption (forecast assumption)+$21.08
Terminal-growth assumption (forecast assumption)+$18.94
Discount rate (macro assumption)+$10.94
Current base IV/share+$325.05

Sequential deterministic bridge · order-dependent contributions · exactly reconciled

Market inputs researched

Risk-free rate

The 10-year US Treasury note yielded 4.68% on August 12, 2026, and this default-free long-duration rate is used directly as the risk-free rate for a US-dollar cash-flow discount.

4.7%
high
Beta

Published 5-year betas for JPM cluster at 0.98-1.00, and this case adopts 1.00 because a diversified universal bank with both rate-sensitive lending and cyclical capital-markets revenue tracks broad market risk closely.

1
medium
Equity risk premium

Damodaran's forward-looking implied ERP backed out of S&P 500 prices and expected cash flows was 4.23% over the US Treasury bond rate at the start of 2026, and that market-implied figure is used unadjusted.

4.2%
medium
Share price

JPM traded at $362.61 on August 12, 2026 within a $361.30-$363.61 daily range, and the last trade is used as the market price against which the modeled value is compared.

362.61
high
Cost of debt

JPM's senior unsecured debt carries single-A ratings, so its marginal borrowing cost tracks the ICE BofA Single-A US corporate index rather than the 6.27% Baa index; adding a roughly 80-90 basis point single-A spread to the 4.68% 10-year Treasury gives about 5.5% pre-tax.

5.5%
medium
Researched byClaude Opus 5
Why the model matters →

Generated 8/12/2026, 3:00:12 PM · pipeline v1.1.0