UNH

UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCNYSE
View company geography

Valuation snapshot

Below base case

Price is between the bear and base cases.

Price captured with valuation · Valuation Sep 5, 2026

$397.14
price
$428.93
base IV/share
Track record
$40.9B
Net debt

From reported financials.

What drives UNH's base case?

base-case thesis

After a brutal 2025 in which medical costs spiked and profitability briefly cratered, UnitedHealth has spent 2026 deliberately trading membership for pricing discipline in its Medicare Advantage business, and management has already raised its full-year guidance twice on the back of that discipline. The base case takes management's own playbook at face value: revenue growth reaccelerates gradually as repricing finishes and Optum's pharmacy and health-services businesses keep growing, while operating margins recover toward, but not fully back to, their pre-2025 highs. Taxes and reinvestment normalize toward their multi-year historical averages rather than either 2025's anomalies or an optimistic best case.

What shapes the assumptions

  • Management's own raised FY2026 guidance and improving MA retention

    adjusted EPS guidance raised to $19.50-$20 from $18.25+

    Raises revenue growth

  • Stated Medicare Advantage margin recovery targets

    MA margin trending to upper half of 2-4% band by 2027

    Raises operating margin

  • 2025 tax rate normalizes back to historical average

    effective tax rate reverting from 12.9% (2025) toward 23.8% (2024) norm

    Informs tax rate

  • Balanced capex, bolt-on M&A and larger buyback program

    capex ~0.8% of revenue plus $5B+ 2026 buyback

    Informs reinvestment

  • Decade-long track record of above-GDP revenue compounding

    revenue growth from $94.2B (2010) to $447.6B (2025)

    Raises terminal growth

Each driver links a business metric to the forecast assumption it shapes — the basis for this case, not investment advice.

Why the gap?

The market is pricing this as if revenue grows 3.9% a year. Over the last 5 years it grew 10.6% a year — so the price assumes less than it has delivered.

What else could explain it?
Or, holding growth steady
the price is also consistent with a 7.0% operating margin, against the 7.5% assumed here.
How confident is this estimate?
Robustness 55.0/10 (Moderate) — some of any gap is our own uncertainty rather than disagreement.
What would change the answer?
Which assumption this valuation swings on, and by how much.

Many combinations of assumptions reproduce the same price. These are ways to read what the market might be expecting, not the market's actual view. How this is worked out

Research & assumptions

Inspect the valuation thesis, cases, risks, evidence, and model inputs.

Three independently researched cases generated automatically from published financials. Every assumption is justified and cited; the discount rate is computed from researched market inputs.

Company value drivers

Ranked operating metrics and the valuation assumptions they influence.

1. Consolidated medical care ratio (quarterly)

The share of premium revenue paid out in medical claims; the single biggest driver of UnitedHealthcare's margin recovery or deterioration.

86.7%

reported
Consolidated medical care ratio (quarterly)Operating profitoperating margin / EBIT → IV (down)Consolidated medical care ratio (quarterly)Revenue forecastUnitedHealthcare premium pricing → IV (mixed)
UNH Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results

2. UnitedHealthcare Medicare Advantage membership (period-end)

Number of enrolled Medicare Advantage members; the main lever behind the deliberate trade-off between near-term growth and margin recovery.

7,565,000

reported
UnitedHealthcare Medicare Advantage membership (period-end)Revenue forecastUnitedHealthcare premium revenue → IV (up)UnitedHealthcare Medicare Advantage membership (period-end)Operating profitMedicare Advantage segment margin → IV (mixed)
UnitedHealthcare Medicare Advantage Is Shrinking in 2026 & 2027

3. Consolidated revenue growth, year-over-year (quarterly)

The quarterly pace of top-line growth, the most direct real-time read on whether the revenue forecast path is tracking.

0.4%

reported
Consolidated revenue growth, year-over-year (quarterly)Revenue forecasttotal consolidated revenue → IV (up)
UNH Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results

4. Capital expenditures as % of revenue (annual)

Capex relative to revenue, a proxy for how much of the business's growth requires reinvestment versus being available as free cash flow.

0.8%

derived
Capital expenditures as % of revenue (annual)Free cash flowcapital expenditure → IV (up)
UnitedHealth Group Reports 2025 Results and Issues 2026 Outlook

5. Effective income tax rate (annual)

The provision for income taxes as a share of pre-tax earnings, directly setting the DCF tax-rate assumption and flagging one-off distortions.

12.9%

reported
Effective income tax rate (annual)After-tax profitprovision for income taxes → IV (up)
UNH 2025 Form 10-K

Base inputs from financials

source period →

Base revenue (TTM)

$450.1B

Diluted shares

906,000,000

Net cash

-$40.9B

Bear

low confidence

$193.98

IV / share

-51.2% vs $397.14

Enterprise

$216.7B

Equity

$175.7B

Discount rate

7.0%

Cost of equity

7.6%

Where the value comes from

Explicit cash flows
$49.58
Terminal value
$189.56
Net cash
-$45.16
Intrinsic value / share
$193.98

97.7% of the value rests on the terminal value — high dependency. A small change to terminal growth moves the valuation a lot — see terminal growth below.

Revenue growth2.0% → 3.0% → 3.5% → 4.0% → 4.0%medium

How derived: H1 2026 revenue grew only ~1.2% YoY (Q1 +1.96%, Q2 +0.37%) as UnitedHealthcare deliberately shed roughly 0.9M Medicare Advantage members (8.445M at YE2025 to 7.565M at Q2 2026) to reprice its book; bear case assumes DOJ scrutiny and elevated cost trend keep growth muted before only a slow reacceleration toward mid-single digits.

Why this confidence: Two consecutive quarters of actual reported deceleration (Q1 +2.0%, Q2 +0.4%) anchor the near-term path , Five-year horizon requires assuming the DOJ investigation outcome and PBM reform trajectory, both unresolved , Management already reversed course once in 2026 by raising guidance, showing the trend can turn faster than a bear path assumes

Evidence for

Evidence against

Operating margin5.5%medium

How derived: Consolidated operating margin cratered from 8.05%-8.32% in early 2025 to just 0.34% in Q4 2025 before recovering to 7.13%-8.05% in H1 2026; bear case assumes the recovery stalls in the mid-single digits as elevated medical cost trend and DOJ-related compliance costs persist, well below the ~8% margins UNH posted before the 2025 blowup.

Why this confidence: Company's own guidance points to steady margin improvement, working against a stalled-recovery thesis , Five quarters of directly reported margins (0.3% to 8.3%) give a real observed range to anchor a conservative estimate within , DOJ investigation outcome (fines, mandated business changes) is unknown and could be more severe than assumed

Evidence for

Evidence against

Tax rate26.0%low

How derived: Effective tax rate was 20.5% (2023), 23.8% (2024) and an anomalous 12.9% (2025, attributed by the company to divestiture losses and depressed pretax income); bear case assumes normalization above the historical range plus incremental cost from a possible DOJ-related settlement or lost deductions.

Why this confidence: Three years of reported effective tax rates give a directly observed historical band (20.5%-23.8% ex-2025 anomaly) , Assumes a specific incremental settlement/penalty effect that is speculative and not yet confirmed by any filing

Measured by

Evidence for

  • 2025's unusually low 12.9% effective tax rate was explicitly attributed to one-off divestiture losses and lower pretax income, meaning some reversion upward is likely.[UNH 2025 Form 10-K]· primary

Evidence against

  • No disclosed tax-specific penalty is currently associated with the DOJ investigation, and UNH's historical effective rate has topped out near 24%, not 26%.[UNH 2024 Form 10-K]· primary
Reinvestment rate45.0%low

How derived: FY2025 capex was about $3.6B (~0.8% of revenue), but the bear case assumes higher effective reinvestment as UNH spends on compliance systems, legal defense and IT remediation tied to the DOJ probe without a commensurate growth payoff, while deleveraging toward Moody's cited ~2.0x debt/EBITDA target competes for cash.

Why this confidence: Directly opposed to the most recent capital-allocation signal (bigger buyback), a real tension in this assumption , Capex-to-revenue ratio itself is low and stable historically (~0.8-0.9%), so the compliance-spend adjustment is judgment, not observed data

Evidence for

Evidence against

Terminal growth2.0%low

How derived: Set below the base case to reflect a scenario where continued Medicare Advantage regulatory tightening and DOJ-driven business-model changes structurally cap UNH's ability to outgrow the broader US economy in perpetuity.

Why this confidence: Terminal growth is a single number 5+ years out with no direct observation possible , Anchored to a conservative macro band (near/below long-run nominal GDP) rather than aggressive company-specific extrapolation

No tracked driver measures this assumption yet.

Evidence for

Evidence against

  • UNH's revenue still grew from $400.3B (2024) to $447.6B (2025), +11.8%, even amid the DOJ probe and cost-trend shock, arguing the long-run ceiling may be higher than this case assumes.[UNH 2025 Form 10-K]· primary

Base

medium confidence

$428.93

IV / share

+8.0% vs $397.14

Enterprise

$429.5B

Equity

$388.6B

Discount rate

7.0%

Cost of equity

7.6%

Where the value comes from

Explicit cash flows
$86.89
Terminal value
$387.20
Net cash
-$45.16
Intrinsic value / share
$428.93

90.3% of the value rests on the terminal value — high dependency. A small change to terminal growth moves the valuation a lot — see terminal growth below.

Revenue growth3.5% → 5.0% → 6.0% → 6.5% → 6.5%medium

How derived: Builds off management's raised FY2026 guidance (adjusted EPS $19.50-$20, up from $18.25+) after the Q2 2026 beat, with growth reaccelerating from H1 2026's ~1.2% pace as Medicare Advantage repricing completes, membership stabilizes, and Optum Rx/Optum Health continue their 2025 growth (+16%/-3% respectively), landing below the 2015-2025 historical average (~10-12%) given UNH's much larger revenue base.

Why this confidence: Directly grounded in the company's own raised guidance, a primary disclosure , Requires assuming a reacceleration that has not yet shown up in reported quarterly growth numbers

Price implies: 3.9% vs our 5.5% — one of several sets that fit this price

Evidence for

Evidence against

Operating margin7.5%medium

How derived: Operating margin recovered from a Q4 2025 trough of 0.34% to 7.13%-8.05% in H1 2026; base case assumes continued gradual recovery toward, but not fully back to, the ~8-9% margins UNH posted in 2021-2024, consistent with management's stated target of reaching the upper half of its 2-4% Medicare Advantage margin band by 2027.

Why this confidence: Management has given explicit, quantified multi-year margin targets (2-4% MA band, upper half by 2027) , 2025 showed margins can deteriorate very quickly (8.3% to 0.3% in three quarters), so the recovery path is not guaranteed

Price implies: 7.0% vs our 7.5% — one of several sets that fit this price

Evidence for

Evidence against

Tax rate24.0%high

How derived: Reverts to the pre-2025 historical effective tax rate norm (20.5% in 2023, 23.8% in 2024) after the anomalous 12.9% in 2025 that the 10-K attributes to divestiture losses and depressed pretax income.

Why this confidence: Three years of directly reported effective tax rates bound this estimate tightly , Company explains the 2025 anomaly, reducing ambiguity about which rate is the 'true' normalized one

Measured by

Evidence for

  • The 10-K explicitly attributes the 2025 tax-rate drop to one-off divestiture and pretax-income effects, implying reversion toward the historical range.[UNH 2025 Form 10-K]· primary

Evidence against

  • If pretax income remains depressed relative to 2024, similar mechanical tax-rate volatility could recur and the rate could undershoot 24% again.[UNH 2025 Form 10-K]· primary
Reinvestment rate35.0%medium

How derived: FY2025 capex of ~$3.6B (0.8% of revenue) plus continued bolt-on M&A (Optum's history of deals like Change Healthcare and LHC Group) and a step-up to at least $5B of 2026 buybacks signal a balanced capital allocation between growth investment and shareholder returns.

Why this confidence: Capex-to-revenue ratio has been stable and low for several years (~0.8-0.9%), a directly observed base rate , Blends capex with judgmental M&A/reinvestment assumptions not separately itemized in filings

Evidence for

Evidence against

Terminal growth2.5%medium

How derived: Set near long-run US nominal GDP growth (real GDP ~2% plus inflation ~2%, moderated for a mature, heavily regulated payer/PBM franchise), consistent with typical terminal assumptions for a large-cap company of UNH's scale.

Why this confidence: Anchored to widely used macro proxies (long-run nominal GDP) rather than firm-specific extrapolation, a standard and defensible convention , No single data point can validate a terminal assumption; it is inherently a judgment call over an infinite horizon

No tracked driver measures this assumption yet.

Evidence for

  • UNH's revenue compounded well above GDP for over a decade (from $94.2B in 2010 to $447.6B in 2025), supporting durable above-GDP secular demand even at terminal maturity.[UNH 2025 Form 10-K]· primary

Evidence against

Bull

low confidence

$688.13

IV / share

+73.3% vs $397.14

Enterprise

$664.4B

Equity

$623.4B

Discount rate

7.0%

Cost of equity

7.6%

Where the value comes from

Explicit cash flows
$118.01
Terminal value
$615.28
Net cash
-$45.16
Intrinsic value / share
$688.13

89.4% of the value rests on the terminal value — high dependency. A small change to terminal growth moves the valuation a lot — see terminal growth below.

Revenue growth4.5% → 6.5% → 8.0% → 8.5% → 8.5%low

How derived: Assumes the margin-recovery playbook works faster than guided: MA repricing completes by 2027, allowing UNH to resume competing for membership, the DOJ investigation resolves without material sanction, and Optum Rx/Health (which grew 16% and roughly -3% respectively in 2025 but with Rx accelerating) reaccelerate, pushing blended growth back toward the 8-13% range UNH posted in 2021-2023, tempered for its now much larger revenue base.

Why this confidence: Requires several favorable, currently unconfirmed events (fast DOJ resolution, membership regrowth) to compound together , Grounded in the same guidance-raise trend that has held for two consecutive quarters in 2026

Evidence for

Evidence against

Operating margin9.0%low

How derived: Assumes UNH's disclosed $1.5B AI investment in care delivery, administrative and pharmacy productivity, combined with Medicare Advantage repricing reaching the top of its 2-4% margin band, pushes consolidated operating margin modestly above the ~8.8% peak UNH achieved around 2021, ahead of management's own 2027 timeline.

Why this confidence: Exceeds any margin UNH has actually reported historically, so there is no direct precedent , Based on a specific, disclosed $1.5B AI investment program rather than a vague productivity story

Evidence for

Evidence against

  • UNH's historical peak consolidated operating margin (~8.8% around 2021) was achieved before the DOJ investigation and cost-trend shock existed, so exceeding it is a high bar.[UNH annual revenue and margin history]· primary
Tax rate23.5%low

How derived: Slightly below the pre-2025 historical norm (23.8% in 2024), reflecting a modestly favorable mix shift as Optum's technology and services lines scale, with no assumed DOJ-related tax penalty.

Why this confidence: Small, narrow deviation from the base case reduces the risk of the assumption being far off , Relies on a mix-shift tax benefit that is not separately disclosed or quantified by the company

Measured by

Evidence for

  • UNH's reported effective tax rate was 20.5% in 2023, showing the rate has historically been able to run below 24%.[UNH 2023 Form 10-K]· primary

Evidence against

  • 24% approximates the practical floor UNH has shown outside one-off anomalies like 2025's 12.9%, so sustained sub-24% rates are not the clear norm.[UNH 2024 Form 10-K]· primary
Reinvestment rate30.0%low

How derived: Assumes AI-driven productivity gains reduce the capital intensity needed to support each dollar of growth, so a lower share of NOPAT needs reinvestment even as the buyback program (raised to at least $5B for 2026) continues alongside disciplined, high-return bolt-on M&A.

Why this confidence: Assumes a productivity payoff from the AI program that has not yet shown up in reported reinvestment or margin data , Consistent with the company's demonstrated willingness to raise capital returned to shareholders in 2026

Evidence for

Evidence against

  • Capex has trended up in absolute dollars in recent years (toward $3.6B in 2025) even as revenue growth slowed, suggesting reinvestment needs may not fall as assumed.[UNH 2025 Form 10-K]· primary
Terminal growth3.0%low

How derived: Reflects continued above-GDP secular healthcare spending growth (aging population, chronic disease prevalence, Optum's expanding value-based and technology-enabled care model), allowing UNH to sustain modestly above-nominal-GDP growth in perpetuity.

Why this confidence: Terminal growth cannot be directly observed or tested against any single reported figure , Extrapolates from a well-documented decade of historical outgrowth of GDP in reported revenue

No tracked driver measures this assumption yet.

Evidence for

  • UNH's revenue compounded at 12%-20% annually through the mid-2010s to 2023 (e.g. +20.4% in 2015, +17.7% in 2016, +14.6% in 2023) as it diversified into Optum, well above GDP, supporting a structurally higher long-run ceiling.[UNH 2025 Form 10-K]· primary

Evidence against

  • A 3% perpetual growth rate implies UNH permanently outgrows long-run US nominal GDP, a strong assumption for a company already generating $450B of annual revenue.[Analyst reasoning from company scale]· estimate

Valuation robustness

reliability of the estimate, not a stock rating

55 / 100 · Moderate

Scenario dispersion4.2
Terminal-value dependency1
Historical stability4.3
Margin predictability8.6
Forecast visibility6.8
Evidence quality10

Formula v1.0.0. Higher means a more reliable estimate — not a recommendation.

Quality checks

Automated model-risk flags — warnings, not recommendations.

  • 90% of the intrinsic value rests on the terminal value — a small change to terminal growth moves the valuation a lot.terminal growth

Per-share economics

Business growth after changes in the diluted share count.

PeriodRevenue growthFCF/shareFCF/share growthSharesShare growth
Q3 20249.2%13.93115.0%930M-0.6%
Q1 20259.8%4.971041.6%918M-0.4%
Q2 202512.9%6.939.1%910M-1.9%
Q3 202512.2%5.57-60.0%908M-2.4%
Q1 20262.0%8.9580.4%910M-0.9%
Q2 20260.4%11.3263.4%906M-0.4%

Valuation history every run

Sep 5, 2026Bear$193.98Bull$688.13Base$428.93Price$397.14
$154.45$297.75$441.06$584.36$727.66Sep 5, 2026

History builds as the valuation is recalculated — this is the first recorded run.

Market inputs researched

Risk-free rate

The 10-year US Treasury note yield closed at 4.78% on September 4, 2026, the standard risk-free rate proxy for a USD-denominated DCF.

4.8%
high
Beta

Yahoo Finance reports a 5-year monthly beta of 0.63 for UNH against the S&P 500, corroborated by stockanalysis.com's 0.62, reflecting UNH's historically defensive, lower-volatility profile as a diversified health-benefits/services company even after the 2025 stock decline.

0.63
medium
Equity risk premium

Aswath Damodaran's 2026 edition / most recent (July 2026) update puts the implied US equity risk premium at 4.45%, derived from current S&P 500 prices and forward cash-flow expectations.

4.5%
medium
Share price

UNH last traded at $397.14 per Yahoo Finance/Investing.com quotes as of early September 2026.

397.14
high
Cost of debt

UNH carries a Moody's A2 rating with a negative outlook; adding a representative A-to-BBB corporate credit spread to the 4.78% 10-year Treasury yield, and cross-checking against the ICE BofA BBB US Corporate Index effective yield of 5.59% (August 2026) and UNH's own disclosed revolving-credit-facility draw rates of 4.2%-6.8% (FY2025 10-K), implies a pretax cost of debt of roughly 5.5%.

5.5%
medium
Researched byClaude Sonnet 5
Why the model matters →

Generated 9/5/2026, 4:56:40 PM · pipeline v1.2.0